San Francisco's Business Attorneys

We are attorneys in San Francisco that focus on Small Business, Litigation, and Intellectual Property.

  • ARI Law Website
  • (8) Ratings & Reviews
  • CA State Bar Info
  • Contact Us
  • CA Local Rules

Release of Claims: Potential Benefits and Pitfalls

  • by Bo
  • in Business Litigation · Commercial Law · Litigation
  • — 25 Jun, 2012

In drafting contracts, it’s a good idea to keep in mind current and future areas of potential liability. One way to keep these possible issues at bay is through a release of claims. A release of claim is essentially a waiver of claims or causes of action, and can be mutual or unilateral. A common version of a release of claims is a settlement agreement, in which one party relinquishes the right to a cause of action against another for some type of consideration. (Remember consideration? It’s an integral part in contract formation, along with offer and acceptance. In a nutshell, consideration is something of value that induces each party to enter into a contract. Refer to our previous blog posts on business negotiation and contract drafting here for more tips on general contract drafting.)

A release of claims is generally valid, as long as they meet some core criteria.  Two general principles guide the law on releases: First, a general release is valid as long as it does not violate any statute. As such, you cannot circumvent legislative decisions and contract to waive any claim or cause of action if the legislature has expressly said otherwise. This is usually only in the case where lawmakers find a certain cause of action or claim so important that they believe that parties should not be able to waive it under any circumstance.

Second, a general release is valid as long as it does not violate public policy. “Public policy” is a vague, and somewhat ambiguous concept—but in essence, voiding a general release using the doctrine of public policy is to discourage the upholding of a compromise or settlement in the face of fraud, mistake or accident. After all, courts want to encourage settlement, compromise, negotiation, and mediation outside of the courtroom, and if parties have willingly and voluntarily come to an agreement, a court sees no reason not to uphold such an agreement unless some other unsavory factors have been at play.

There are some other additional factors which courts take into consideration when interpreting contracts, and which could be important to your case, so always be sure to consult your own attorney first if you’re contemplating the use of a release of claims in your business arrangements.

Share

Tags: attorneybay areabusiness litigationcontractlawyerpublic policyrelease of claimsSan Franciscosettlement agreementwaiver

  • Previous story Common Errors in Contract Drafting and Negotiations
  • Next story Affordable Care Act: Supreme Court Healthcare Ruling
  • About Ali Aalaei, Esq.

    Contact Ali
    Ali is a practicing attorney serving the greater San Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley. His three
    areas of focus are small business, litigation and intellectual property.
    (415) 830-9968
    Ali Aalaei
  • Tabs

    • Recent Posts
    • Most Popular
    • Tags
    • CA Franchise Tax Board BannerCalifornia Franchise Registrations and RenewalsApril 27, 2013
    • Software LicensingGeneral Software Licensing Strategies – Part 3: Policing InfringementMarch 27, 2013
    • NFL TrademarksNFL Trademarks: Colin Kaepernick Protects His NameFebruary 9, 2013
    • Board of Directors“Fiduciary Duty” – It’s More Than Just a Fancy Term.January 29, 2013
    • PinterestIs Pinterest Liable for Copyright Infringement?February 28, 2012
    • FranchisingFederal Franchise Laws regarding Franchisors and FranchiseesJuly 18, 2012
    • Leahy-Smith America Invents ActLeahy-Smith America Invents Act: The Most Comprehensive Overhaul to the Patent System Since 1836October 6, 2011
    • Contract NegotiationsCommon Errors in Contract Drafting and NegotiationsJune 18, 2012
    • attorney bay area Bay Area Business Lawyers breach of contract business business litigation California Civil Suit SF Superior compliance Confidentiality Agreement contract Copyright copyright infringement copyright law defense discrimination employment litigation franchise franchisee franchisor fraud How to file lawsuit in San Francisco intellectual property Internet Law law Lawsuit Lawsuits in California lawyer licensing litigation Nondisclosure Agreement patent patent law patent litigation Patent Reform Act Pinterest San Francisco San Jose silicon valley small business small business lawyer san francisco software startup startups Trademark
  • RSS Popular Law Stories from the Web

    • Kristy Goldman and Jason Wright Join King Law Group - Sacramento Bee
    • The Securities Arbitration Law Firm of Klayman & Toskes Investigates Claims of ... - DailyFinance
    • SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Law Office of Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces ... - DailyFinance
    • rue21 Shareholder Alert: Briscoe Law Firm and Powers Taylor, LLP Investigate ... - MarketWatch (press release)
    • Notice to LPL Customers: The Securities Arbitration Law Firm of Klayman ... - Business Wire (press release)
    • Acquity Group Shareholder Alert: Briscoe Law Firm and Powers Taylor, LLP ... - MarketWatch (press release)
    • Top 5: Largest litigation law firms in C. Fla. - Orlando Business Journal (blog)
    • Viberts Voted Litigation Law Firm of the Year - Jersey Isle News
    • Sean S. Modjarrad Litigation Law Blog on Lawyers.com - Lawyers.com Blog (blog)
    • Faye Riva Cohen Litigation Law Blog on Lawyers.com - Lawyers.com Blog (blog)

© Copyright 2013 San Francisco's Business Attorneys. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.